Depending on the “constant thought of considering small-label and long-identity mating just like the not being opposite posts”, we currently lead this notion in the earlier kind of brand new manuscript (today in pp. 4-5, outlines 91-108):
Which old-fashioned look at mating orientation could have been slammed of the particular article writers, such as for instance Jackson and you may Kirkpatrick , exactly who claimed that small-label and enough time-name direction do not need to feel opposing poles, however, size that, whenever you are adversely associated, can be differentiated. Some other experts have indicated the appropriateness out-of abandoning new antique unidimensional posture off quick-term orientations and enjoying an effective multidimensional direction . e., earlier in the day sociosexual decisions), thinking (we.e., beliefs throughout the everyday gender), and attract (we.age., arousal on account of likelihood of everyday gender). not, it’s still popular one to researchers always investigation mating strategies instance reverse posts and you will sociosexuality away from an excellent unidimensional approach when they learn market correlates.
“A disorder to be an excellent solution is that relationships applications users was much time-title created or, at least, for as White Sites dating sites long-term created as general people.” So it question can be neither become handled, neither answered regarding the test, look for second point.
Response: Pursuing the your recommendation i have changed that it sentence (pp. 5-6, lines 128-130): “An ailment for being an effective option would be that relationships software profiles try enough time-identity depending otherwise, at the very least, provided that-title mainly based due to the fact non-users”. Yet not, i have perhaps not were able to select the “second point” which had been connected to this issue. Thus, we simply changed this matter regarding your very first an element of the reviewer’s review.
A primary section ‘s the stating getting generalizability of one’s test while you are there are a couple of exclusions made: Once: Ages try restricted of 18 so you’re able to twenty-six.
Response: Many thanks for their opinion. We are being unsure of about what is the problem with the very last try many years. From our insights, there are two main options. First, our take to can not be general to all or any society. I totally agree with it. That is why as to the reasons, currently in the last sort of new manuscript, we within the Discussion point (now inside p. 15, outlines 336-340):
Other limits have been regarding the brand new representativeness of one’s shot and you will the brand new generalization of the overall performance. One of several last professionals, the fresh try try generally people, aged ranging from 18 and twenty six, solitary and from a single school, making the performance hard to generalize to all the university students and you may, still shorter to help you younger non-students.
Next, in case the issue is in order to ban the individuals additional one age range, so it decision was made becoming uniform and you can defined with the introduction standards of past degree used which have university products (see, such as for example: Barrada ainsi que al., 2018; Barrada et al., 2019; Castro and Santos-Iglesias, 2016; Castro ainsi que al., 2020; Fernandez del Rio mais aussi al., 2019). That it looks regarding description of your study’s inclusion criteria (today, from inside the p. 6, traces 144-19). We decided to remain consistent round the knowledge to reduce researchers’ grade out-of liberty and you may, hence, stop possible p-hacking. The latest exception standards about the years was predetermined and you may consistent throughout our training.
For example sociosexual conclusion (i
Second: Simply anybody offered on their own while the women or men was basically found in brand new analyses (they also might possibly be fell and thought to be lost throughout the regression).
Hence, such as for example, you are able to focus a steady relationships and you can, whenever you are trying it, look after numerous sexual relationship instead of relationship [twenty seven,28]
Response: In terms of those who don’t select themselves as the people otherwise ladies, as well as get noticed throughout the part Professionals (today, for the p. 6, lines 144-19), there have been 13 people from an initial take to of 1,996, and therefore signifies 0.65% of these shot. Considering the small-size of decide to try from players (currently really small prior to almost every other exception to this rule conditions was basically applied), it actually was ple. Having eg a limited test size, statistical electricity would-be low. Including, that isn’t possible to mix this group with some of both majority intercourse identities.