As a whole, the four variables give account of 44% of the dependent variable variance (ATLG), the linear relation among variables being significant (F (cuatro,487) = ; p < 0.001). The most important variable in the regression equation is political self-categorization (? = -0.30; p < 0.001), followed by sex (? = 0.28; p < 0.001) and religion (? = -0.11; p < 0.05). The socioeconomic level variable has no effect on ATLG scores.
Earlier training signify gay guys are analyzed more negatively if they are allowed to be capable manage their sexual pref-
272 = 4.94; p < 0.001). These differences are also reported by women, showing that they assess female homosexuality more negatively than male homosexuality (t241 = ; p < 0.001).
Finally, results above show that religious subjects and those who identify with the right in the political continuum have more negative attitudes toward homosexuals. Among religious subjects, those who give more importance to religion also reported a more negative attitude, though https://datingranking.net/es/citas-musicales/ only in assessing lesbians (F 274) = 3.89; p < 0.05).
Taking one to a man try homosexual relates to that many of them are not gay anymore, however, recognizing good lesbian implies an excellent reformulation of the societal steps
Due to the good fit of the models, facts raise as design fit develops. So, both-grounds, second-order model advised achieves the best fit, giving the ATLG design greater independence. Overall performance keep the hypothesis the ATLG foundation design is actually complex and you will would not aim at the computing a general basis of intimate bias, and that ATG and you may ATL, even if closely correlated, create getting a differentiated way of measuring prejudice to the gay people and you can lesbians.
The newest factor that best demonstrates to you bad perceptions into the lesbians is the wondering the exposure poses on Traditional Philosophy. It questioning regarding viewpoints requires the transgression off gender positions founded and the questioning from ladies’ part in the societal construction. Additional a couple of ATL proportions reference each other lesbian’s Societal Rights and the Public Sanction that comes from their legal rights and you may old-fashioned character transgression. For this reason , for this part transgression becoming so adversely examined in “machista” societies for instance the Chilean one and also for lesbians to get ideas actions less positive than simply gay males out-of both heterosexual males and girls determining him or her. The outcome from homosexual guys try a little different once the ATG size focus on other issues. Beliefs about male homosexuality and its particular nature are important.
erence (Sakalli, 2002; Verweij ainsi que al., 2008), that’s, whenever homosexuality is an alternative perceptions become more bad. Possibly, this is why this new factor Thinking communities including Rights due to the fact while they try theoretically separable, gay males liberties depends or perhaps closely associated with the new attributions heterosexual sufferers share with homosexuality nature.
Lady intercourse role transgression is more punished than just that of homosexual boys as second just end a certain blessed standing which have their solution, therefore position on their own in one level since another societal minority classification. The current presence of an anti-fraction bias seriously grounded on a lot more traditional communities must be remembered to describe prejudice membership. Lesbians differ since their mind-acceptance questions the possibilities of reproducing a social design considering men rule. They state an equalitarian position on personal hierarchy. Abilities show that prejudice membership on gay guys are low, which transgression becoming alot more sociably tolerable than that of lesbians.
ATLG measure functions was sturdy which means allow it to be a good indication of one’s populace emotions to your the two communities and you can, therefore, the size office remains relevant. Unlike almost every other knowledge (Stoeber Morera, 2007) this one implies that ATLG isn’t a broad discrimination index (standard underlying foundation), nonetheless it analyzes several teams and this, even when that have common treats (indicating high relationship), it have differential issues that make them are examined that have unique factors. In any event, the scale examined remains pertinent to distinguish these attitude groups, no matter what fact that such distinctions just weren’t felt through the their elaboration.